Was the removal of Haitian TPS moral or constitutionally legal and just…an excerpt from my most recent motion to the immigration courts (Aug 13/26).

Standard

All of the text below is from my  Aug 13/26 motion to the US Immigration court, for a remote video hearing, which the acting immigration judge denied without giving any explanation.


MODERN US Immigration currently has red-herring immigration laws in place.  One of which is the recent Supreme Court ruling empowering ICE to target Hispanics. Vasquez-Perdomo v. Noem, 148 F.4th 656, 671 (9th Cir. 2025). This ruling does not respect the Declaration of Independence, which says that ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL.  Another example is the recent Supreme Court ruling regarding Haitian immigrants in the United States under Temporary Protected Status (TPS).  Mullin v. Doe  No. 25–1083 (June 25, 2026). It takes more than this summary to prove the unconstitutionality of that ruling, but, in short, this recent ruling is in step with MODERN US Immigration, disregarding the 10th Amendment.

“Haitian immigrants with TPS were brought to Springfield, Ohio, at the request of the Republican Governor of Ohio and at the request of the Republican mayor of Springfield, Ohio, because they had manufacturing jobs that were going unfilled.” (Hawk Podcast, 5 min, 39 sec mark, https://youtube.com/watch?v=1k6BkRY5wm8&is=GM2eNcUKTLcfyedT )

‘President Trump singled out the Haitian community there……’They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the cats.’” (Ibid, 4 min, 3 sec mark)  

‘…thousands of Haitians have helped reverse decades of decline in Springfield, Ohio since 2010. They filled factory jobs, opened businesses, started churches, and helped stabilize the city’s population after years of shrinkage. But that growth stopped after JD Vance amplified a pernicious lie about Haitians in Springfield eating dogs and cats, which he admitted was a fabricated story.” (Ibid, 8 min, 49 sec mark) 

“Meanwhile, the situation in Haiti remains bleak. The State Department does not advise Americans to travel there, and it is one of the most dangerous places on earth right now.” (Ibid, 14 min 40 sec mark) 

“According to one estimate, Ohio’s Haitian population has an economic output of $160 million per year and contributes nearly $40 million in local, state, and federal taxes.” (Ibid, 23 min, 23 sec mark)   

“I consider the foundation of the Constitution is laid on this ground. The foundation of the Constitution is built on the Tenth Amendment. All powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution are prohibited by the states are reserved to the states or the people.” (Thomas Jefferson) ‘That’s the Tenth Amendment. He said this is the foundation of the Constitution. This is what defines the role of state and federal governments’” (David Barton, America’s premier Historian) 

David Barton also tells us that the ORIGINAL model of US Immigration had the feds concerned with 3 main things when admitting immigrants into America, AND AFTER THAT IT WAS UP TO THE INDIVIDUAL STATES TO DECIDE WHO THEY WANTED FOR IMMIGRANTS. 

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” (THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE…Article VI Clause 2) “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”  [Marbury vs Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137  174, 176, (1803)

Laws which go against the Constitution to deny persons of their inalienable rights, make such laws null and void.  For the government to deprive any person of their unalienable rights is an act of tyranny and is punishable by law.  If ICE removed a blonde-haired person simply for being blonde-haired and not red-haired, they would have committed a crime. So would the Judiciary if it ordered the removal of the blonde-haired person… even though Congress had enacted this red-haired immigration law. 

“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”  (TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242)


I made this article for the following article…