As time permits I will work on this there are many evidences I learned while in ICE detainment Apr 29/21 – Aug 27/21
In my habeas corpus proceedings the magistrate made reference to an immigration habeas corpus. As far as I’m aware there is no true immigration habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is simply habeas corpus. The reason why I suspect the magistrate of the District Court of Washington made a distinction about immigration habeas corpus is because legal precedent has usurped the Constitution and put a six-month suspension on habeas corpus petitions for immigrants…which is unconstitutional. I am 99.99% certain there is no immigration habeas corpus, but I asked the magistrate that question in my court documents because she made reference to immigration habeas in her court documents. Suddenly, while in the midst of these habeas proceedings, I was released from detainment and so my habeas petion proceedings ended… which means I never got an answer to the question. I am unaware of a immigration habeas distinction in the US Constitution. Do any of you know if the US Constitution has been revised to include an IMMIGRATION habeas? Has Article V been used to ammend the writ if habeas corpus? I doubt it…knowing DHS’ track record.
DHS has ‘immunity’ (so they think) to the 4th and 5th Ammendments via the 100 mile CBP zone. CBP has been granted, by unconstitutional laws, the thumbs up to stop, search, seize & detain any person (WITHOUT a Warrant) with in 100 miles of the USA border. HOWEVER…”All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” [Marbury vs Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137 174, 176, (1803) (Citizens Rule Book, InfoWars, p 7)] The US Constitution does not allow arbitrary stops, searches, seizures, detainments…police CANNOT pull over any car for no good reason and search the car without a warrant. Police CANNOT come into your home and search the premises WITHOUT a warrant!
Immigration Judges from the DOJ DO NOT HAVE authority to release detainees from ICE detainment, but ICE does!..at least that was my experience. I was ASTOUNDED by that! When a detainee challenges the legality of ICE detainment, via the writ of habeas corpus (a constititional right that EVEN immigrants are entitled to), they enter, via the US District Court, into a legal dispute with ICE. The US District magistrate has the authority and power to release from ICE detainment…which makes sense! A JUDGE SHOULD have power to release from ICE detainment. That is what habeas corpus is all about…a judge has power to review the grounds of confinement, and may rule the prisoner SHOULD NOT be confined! I see no just reason that an IJ from the DOJ cannot release an ICE detainee. I had an IJ from the DOJ tell me in court that the law says he cannot release me. DOJ IJs arbitrate other matters that ICE and the immigrant go to court over. If a detainee is ignorant of his rights protected by the writ of habeas corpus he will get no relief from unjust confinement. I met guys in ICE detainment that had been there 2 years, one one guy had been there FOUR YEARS! Mind you, some of these men had committed crimes. I’m 95% certain…just shooting from the hip…that my habeas petition is what got me out of jail. DHS and US Immigration were getting exposed by my JUST use of habeas to CHALLENGE the grounds of my detainment.
In my asylum proceedings I discovered Immigration has its OWN SEPERATE DISTINCT COURT. I looked through my copy of the US Constitution and could find no distinct court for immigration. I see reference to COMMON LAW and CIVIL LAW!…but that’s it! Also …and this is of huge significance … Juries are EXCLUDED from US Immigration courts! INCREDIBLE! This is significant…because…juries have the power to judge not only the facts, but THE LAW ITSELF! Unjust and unconstitutional laws may and have been overturned by juries. But Immigration court is ‘IMMUNE’ to juries! Immigration law is ‘immune’ to juries AND the US Constitution.
I found out about the separate Immigration courts when I inquired into the writ of habeas corpus with a pro bono immigration law firm in Tacoma WA. This firm said they do not, by policy, help ICE detainees with habeas corpus until detainees serve 6 months of ICE detainment. (BTW…GEO, a privately owned prison there in Tacoma, WA, holds ICE detainees. I gleaned information that GEO receives $20,000 PER MONTH per detainee of your tax dollars. There is a resistance movement AGAINST money driven prisons because it is like a slave trade … The longer an immigrant is detained the more GEO makes!) This policy is the progeny of legal precedent established in America’s courts…that only WHEN IT COMES TO US IMMIGRATION habeas corpus is suspended for 6 months…meaning a detained immigrant CANNOT seek relief from unlawful confinement until he has served six months of detainment. But the Constitution specifically says the writ of habeas corpus SHALL NOT BE SUSPENDED!
By means of legal precedent the judiciary have been establishing ‘law’ for decades in America… laws that are CONTRARY to the US Constitution. The Judiciary DOES NOT have power to make law though. Law schools across America are painting the Judiciary as high priests of the law, so that American lawyers today assume court precedent sets the law. That is WHY the pro bono law firm in Tacoma had a policy to not help detainees with habeas petitions until 6 months of detainment was served (I even wrote a very winsome appeal letter to one of their lawyers with my compeling constitutional arguments, but all I heard in response were crickets. It’s like I had touched taboo…that constitutional stuff no one should dare talk about.). Why? Evil agendas are at work in America to destroy her Christian heritage, which is so powerfully represented in her constitution. Check for yourself…on the US Supreme Court web site …and you will see they refer to the 3 EQUAL branches of government. That is NOT TRUE! The Judiciary is the weakest branch of all. The executive branch is the most powerful of the three branches.
“We the People are involved in law making via the most powerful branch…the Congress. The judiciary simply decides controversies of what the law says. But we have ALLOWED the Judiciary to MAKE law. Thomas Jefferson said that will be the seed to undermine and destroy the nation & constitution.”
Mat Staver, Week 6 Biblical Citizenship 46m28s, Patriot Academy/Wall Builders
In the Federalist Papers #51, James Madison said. “Legislative authority necessarily dominates.”, and in the Federalist Papers #78, Alexander Hamilton said, the judiciary is the weakest. The people can never be endangered by that quarter. (But WE THE PEOPLE have been dumbed down, and have not been vigilant. That is how the courts crept in to dominate and start making laws. CES) Hamilton says as long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the Legislative and Executive…Liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone…because the judiciary has neither the sword (that belongs to the Executive) or the purse (that belongs to the Legislative or Congress)… the judiciary has neither force, nor will. (Rick Green,, Week 6 Biblical Citizenship, 49m29s) Rick Green says, “Thus Andrew Jackson could thus say, nice opinion you got there supreme Court. Let’s see you enforce it now.” (Ibid. 53m)
The judiciary is not appointed by the Constitution. It’s appointed by the legislative and executive branches and is accountable to them. Congress is accountable to the people. Congress has the power to abolish the judiciary for even 10 years (double check this quote Rick Green cites from William Gillespie,Week 6 Biblical Citizenship, 54m) Green says, Congress can create lesser courts & abolish courts. Rick says we ought to do that more often (Here is an alternate or complimentary course to Larry Klayman’s 3rd Continental Congress and Citizens Grand Juries, it seems to me. CES) (Ibid 57m) Rick Green brings up a vital fact when he notes here that Congress can take away courts power AND THEY DID NOT TEACH RICK THAT IN LAW SCHOOL! (Ibid 58m) ( Looks like Elon Musk was right when he said university degrees are of little value, because all they do is teach you their agenda. Couple that with Rick’s comment in this week 6 class, that he learned more from David Barton than all his Law school education, and you have a recipe for putting these educational institutions out of business via your wallet and also by law when we get our governmental issues fixed, CES) Rick goes on to say the mindset is that if you have been in law school you know better than everyone else (If I did not have the power of critical thinking to go against the grain when it comes to truth, I would have followed the pro bono lawyers and left off pursuit of the writ of habeas corpus and cooked in jail for a year…but I went against the grain and CHALLENGED the 6 month suspension on habeas, a legal precedent established by the judiciary…and got out in FOUR MONTHS! Even Nickleback knows, “Against the grain should be a way of life. What’s worth the prize is always worth the fight. Every second counts, cuz there is no second try. So live it like you will never live it twice. Don’t take the free ride in your own life.”). But that is not the way it should be. The citizens are to know the Constitution. The Federalist Papers were written, for the average upstate NY farmer. (Ibid 58m15s)
Week 6 Biblical Citizenship, Patriot Academy/Wall Builders
ACCORDING TO THE US CONSTITITION DHS IS BREAKING THE LAW! Do those of you in DHS really want to be law breakers?
THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE Article VI Clause 2…This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-6/clause-2/
“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” [Marbury vs Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137 174, 176, (1803) (Citizens Rule Book, InfoWars, p 7)]
[The purpose of a written constitution is] to bind up the several branches of government by certain laws, which, when they transgress, their acts shall become nullities; to render unnecessary an appeal to the people, or in other words a rebellion, on every infraction of their rights, on the peril that their acquiescence shall be construed into an intention to surrender those rights.
(Thomas Jefferson) https://www.quotemaster.org/q1554cdfcdb4000f222af73159eda2ff5
“Every member of the State ought diligently to read and to study the constitution of his country, and teach the rising generation to be free. By knowing their rights, they will sooner perceive when they are violated, and be the better prepared to defend and assert them.”
“Our very first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John Jay:” (David Barton)
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
10th Ammedment
America is a nation governed by the rule of law …EXCEPT in the case of DHS and US Immigration! Something is DEFINITELY UP with the Feds! Ask Sheriff Richard Mack about the IRS and the FDA. Ask Larry Klayman about America’s judicial system…and the DOJ.
“The thing that sets the American Christian apart from all other people in the world is that he will die on his feet before he will live on his knees.” General George Washington…5:30 min mark…https://youtu.be/YaxGNQE5ZLA
US Immigration is a slave trade…by and large…powered by propoganda. There are so many abuses of civil power in our generation…that is a huge part of how I came so quickly to the conclusion COVID19 is just another power grab… like pastor John MacArthur said. He also wisely said, when you are being lied to all the time you learn to think in reverse. That is an AWESOME statement!
RAIN MAKER (1Kings 8:35, 36) 